Netherlands Burnout Rate (2023)
19.0%
% of employed workers (NEA survey)
+7.7pp since 2007
EU Workforce Burnout Prevalence
~10%
EU+ average (Eurofound / Schaufeli EWCS 2015)
4.3% (FI) – 20.6% (SI); France ~17%
Annual Cost — Work-Related Depression (EU)
>€100bn
Per year (ETUI 2025 estimate)
~10,000 deaths/year (2015 attribution)
ESENER Time Pressure — EU Establishments (2024)
43%
% of EU establishments reporting time pressure
Unchanged from 2014 (43%)

Data

YearBurnout Rate (%)Change (pp)SourceContext
202319.0-1.0ppNetherlands NEA"Post-pandemic normalization; approx. 1.4 million workers affected"
202220.0+3.0ppNetherlands NEA"Post-pandemic peak; highest on record since 2007"
202117.0+1.0ppNetherlands NEA"Recovery year; women and young workers driving increase"
202016.0-1.0ppNetherlands NEA"COVID-19 year; pandemic temporarily suppressed self-reporting"
201917.00.0ppNetherlands NEA"Pre-pandemic peak (equal to 2018)"
201817.0+2.4pp vs 2014Netherlands NEA"Sustained rise; healthcare and education hardest hit"
201414.6+2.2pp vs 2013Netherlands NEA"Breakout year — sharpest single-year jump in series"
201312.4-0.4pp vs 2010Netherlands NEA"Cyclical trough before structural re-acceleration"
201012.8+1.5pp vs 2007Netherlands NEA"Post-GFC; stress rising but not yet accelerating"
200711.3baselineNetherlands NEA"First year of NEA burnout monitoring scale"

About this Dataset

The Netherlands burnout rate reached 20.0% of the employed workforce in 2022 — the highest recorded level since systematic annual monitoring began in 2007 — before easing fractionally to 19.0% in 2023. That represents one in five Dutch workers reporting chronic exhaustion, emotional detachment from work, and reduced professional efficacy severe enough to meet the survey’s validated burnout threshold. Nineteen years ago, in 2007, the same measure stood at 11.3%. The 7.7 percentage-point increase is not a measurement artefact: the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey (NEA), conducted annually by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) on approximately 60,000 workers, has used a consistent burnout scale throughout, making it the most analytically reliable longitudinal burnout time series available in the European Union.

In April 2025, the European Trade Union Institute presented the first comprehensive EU-wide economic quantification of burnout-related costs, estimating that work-related depression — of which burnout is the primary occupational driver — costs the EU more than €100 billion per year; the 2015 attribution modelling underpinning this study found approximately 10,000 deaths attributable to psychosocial work exposures including job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and job insecurity.

The EU-wide picture is more fragmented but directionally consistent. Schaufeli’s 2018 analysis of the Eurofound Sixth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS 2015, N=43,675 workers across 35 countries) found an EU+ average burnout rate of approximately 10%, with the Netherlands at the lower end of the distribution despite its rising trend. The highest burnout prevalences within the EU were recorded in Slovenia (20.6%), France (approximately 17%), and Luxembourg, while Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland) and the Netherlands anchored the low end. Eurofound’s parallel review of national research found that severe burnout — assessed against clinical diagnostic criteria — affects below 5% of the workforce, but moderate self-assessed burnout is reported by 15–25% of workers in cross-sectional studies depending on country and methodology.

The EU-OSHA European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER), conducted every five years across up to 41,000 EU establishments, provides the employer-side complement to the worker surveys. In 2024, 43% of EU establishments reported time pressure as a psychosocial risk factor — statistically unchanged from 43% in 2014 and 45% in 2019. Emotional demands from difficult customers, patients, or pupils were reported by 56% of establishments. The near-total stagnation of these indicators over a decade is analytically significant: it demonstrates that the structural determinants of burnout have not been remediated at the organisational level despite growing regulatory attention and rising awareness campaigns. A quarter of establishments reported no psychosocial risk factors at all, and 31% of companies in the EU-27 have no form of worker representation for safety.

  • Primary data series: Netherlands Working Conditions Survey (NEA), CBS/TNO, annual sample ~60,000 workers; burnout scale based on Copenhagen Burnout Inventory validated items; available from 2007 onwards
  • EU-wide cross-section: Eurofound EWCS 2015 analysis by Schaufeli using MBI-based burnout scoring across 35 countries (EU+ candidate countries and Norway/Switzerland included)
  • Employer-side data: EU-OSHA ESENER (2014, 2019, 2024 waves), establishment-level survey, 30+ countries, reporting prevalence of psychosocial risk factors
  • Economic cost methodology: ETUI 2025 study attributing mortality and morbidity costs to five psychosocial work risk factors (job strain, long hours, job insecurity, effort-reward imbalance, harassment); cost base includes employer productivity losses, healthcare expenditure, and welfare costs
  • Methodological caveat: The Netherlands primary series reflects consistent measurement but represents a single country; EU-wide burnout rates are derived from cross-sectional survey waves with varying methodology across countries and time, limiting strict longitudinal comparability at the EU-27 aggregate level

For corporate strategy teams, private equity sponsors, and sovereign credit analysts assessing European labour market risk, burnout presents a compounding structural headwind: workforce exits before normal retirement age, rising replacement and retraining costs, and — in countries like Belgium and Germany where burnout-related disability claims are legally recognised — a growing contingent liability in social insurance systems. The ESENER data’s decade-long stagnation in psychosocial risk management standards is the clearest signal that this is not a problem the European employer base is solving organically.

Frequently Asked Questions

Burnout — defined by the World Health Organization in ICD-11 as an occupational phenomenon characterised by feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion, increased mental distance from work, and reduced professional efficacy — is measured in the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey (NEA) using a validated four-item scale drawn from the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Respondents answer questions about emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation on a frequency scale; those endorsing high levels on all items are classified as having burnout complaints. The NEA surveys approximately 60,000 employed persons annually, making it one of the most statistically robust annual burnout monitoring systems in Europe.
The Netherlands operates the only annual, nationally representative, methodologically consistent burnout time series in the European Union covering the full period from 2007 to the present. Other EU member states (notably Germany, Belgium, and Sweden) publish burnout or stress-related sick leave data, but with methodological inconsistencies, multi-year gaps, or diagnostic coding changes that make long-run trend comparison unreliable. The Netherlands NEA series uses a fixed measurement instrument, making it the cleanest longitudinal proxy for EU burnout trends. The Dutch context is also analytically important: despite having among the lowest cross-sectional burnout prevalence in Europe (Schaufeli EWCS 2015 analysis), the Netherlands has seen the sharpest documented long-run increase — from 11.3% in 2007 to 20.0% in 2022 — illustrating a structural deterioration even in countries with strong labour market protections.
The Netherlands has historically had below-EU-average burnout prevalence. The 2015 Eurofound-commissioned analysis by Schaufeli, using EWCS data from 35 European countries, found the EU+ average burnout rate at approximately 10%, with the Netherlands at the lower end of the distribution and Slovenia at 20.6% and France at approximately 17% at the high end. The Netherlands crossed the EU average threshold around 2017-2018 as its rate climbed above 17%, representing a structural deterioration. Germany, with an approximately 8% burnout rate based on national survey data and the Schaufeli EWCS 2015 analysis, and Finland at 4.3% remain below the Netherlands' current level. The EU-wide picture is complicated by inconsistent national measurement, but the directional signal from all available surveys — EWCS, ESENER, national health insurance data — is consistently upward.
The European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), in a landmark April 2025 study presented at a European Commission conference on psychosocial risks, estimated that work-related depression — of which burnout is the primary occupational driver — costs the EU more than €100 billion per year, with employers bearing more than 80% of the burden through lost productivity, presenteeism, and replacement costs. In 2015 (the most recent year for which full attribution modelling was completed), approximately 6,000 deaths from coronary heart disease and over 4,800 depression-related suicides were attributed to psychosocial work exposures. A broader 2013 EU-funded Matrix study estimated the total cost of work-related depression at €617 billion annually when absenteeism, presenteeism, productivity loss, healthcare, and welfare costs were included — though this wider estimate covers stress-related illness beyond clinical burnout alone.
Healthcare, education, and social care consistently show the highest burnout rates across all major European surveys. In the Netherlands, the CBS 2021 'Netherlands in Numbers' publication (using NEA data) found 21% of educators and 18% of healthcare and welfare workers reported burnout complaints, compared to 10-12% in transport and agriculture. The EU-OSHA ESENER 2024 survey found that 56% of EU establishments in sectors with high emotional demands (including health, education, and social care) reported difficult customer, patient, or pupil interactions as a key psychosocial risk — the single most-cited stressor across European workplaces. Younger workers and women have driven the most rapid increases since 2020: TNO/CBS data show the burnout rate among Dutch workers aged 18-34 reached one-in-four by 2022, with young women at 29% against young men at 23% (vs. 13% for young men in 2015). Highly educated workers and those in contact-intensive roles are disproportionately affected, with implications for talent retention in knowledge-intensive sectors.
The temporary decline in Netherlands burnout complaints in 2020 (from 17% in 2019 to 16%) reflects a well-documented pandemic 'resilience paradox': during acute external crises, individuals tend to prioritise physiological and job-security concerns over self-reporting of work-related exhaustion, and many workers in non-essential sectors shifted to remote work with initially reduced commuting and scheduling pressure. The subsequent sharp rebound to 17% in 2021 and 20% in 2022 — overshooting the pre-pandemic level by 3 percentage points — demonstrates that the underlying structural drivers (rising work intensity, always-on digital work cultures, care obligations amplified by the pandemic) are not cyclical. Eurofound's EWCS 2024 survey confirmed that the work intensity dimension of job quality has continued deteriorating since 2015, particularly for women, even as physical hazard exposure has declined. The structural interpretation is further supported by Germany's burnout-related sick leave data, which shows mean episode duration rising from 24 days (2012-2014) to 36 days (2020-2022) — indicating that each burnout episode is becoming more severe even as diagnostic practices have stabilised.