Total Notional Outstanding
$845.7T
USD trillions (H1 2025)
+15.9% vs H1 2024
Interest Rate Derivatives
78.7%
Share of total notional (H1 2025)
$665.8T outstanding
Gross Market Value
$21.8T
H1 2025 — actual replacement cost
2.6% of notional outstanding
FX Derivatives
$155.2T
Second-largest category (H1 2025)
18.4% of total notional

Data

PeriodTotal (USD tn)Interest Rate (USD tn)FX (USD tn)Equity (USD tn)CDS (USD tn)
H1 2025845.7665.8155.210.411.3
H2 2024699.5548.3130.18.99.2
H1 2024729.5578.8129.98.79.2
H2 2023667.1529.8118.07.88.7
H1 2023712.9573.6118.57.810.1
H2 2022618.0490.6107.66.99.9
H1 2022632.1502.5109.67.09.5
H2 2021598.4475.3104.27.39.1
H1 2021610.0488.1102.57.59.1
H2 2020582.1466.597.57.18.6

About this Dataset

The global over-the-counter derivatives market reached $845.7 trillion in notional outstanding as of June 2025 — a figure that exceeds global GDP by more than eight times over and represents the single largest financial market by reference amount. The H1 2025 reading marks a 15.9% increase from $729.5 trillion a year earlier, driven primarily by a $87 trillion expansion in interest rate derivatives as financial institutions repositioned duration exposure through the global rate cutting cycle. The previous all-time high of $710.1 trillion was set in H2 2013; the June 2025 figure is 19% above that prior peak.

Notional outstanding is not a measure of loss exposure. The gross market value of all OTC derivatives as of H1 2025 was $21.8 trillion — 2.6% of the notional figure — representing the actual mark-to-market replacement cost if every contract were unwound simultaneously. After counterparty netting, net credit exposure falls further to a fraction of that amount.

Interest rate derivatives remain the dominant instrument class at $665.8 trillion, representing 78.7% of total notional. This reflects the fundamental economics of global capital markets: every multi-year fixed-rate bond, every variable-rate corporate loan, and every cross-border funding transaction creates a natural hedge demand that is overwhelmingly expressed through interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements. Foreign exchange derivatives — the second-largest category at $155.2 trillion — capture the hedging requirements of the $7 trillion daily spot FX market, where importers, exporters, asset managers, and central banks manage currency exposure through forwards and FX swaps with tenors from overnight to multi-year. Credit default swaps stood at $11.3 trillion in H1 2025, a fraction of their $68.7 trillion peak in H1 2008, reflecting compression from compression trading and the waning of the structured credit boom.

  • Dataset: BIS WS_OTC_DERIV2, semi-annual survey of major derivatives dealers globally
  • Reporting basis: Net-gross (single-counted) — each contract is counted once rather than for both counterparties; DER_BASIS=C in the SDMX key
  • Instrument coverage: Interest rate (forwards, swaps, options), foreign exchange (spot excluded), equity-linked, commodity, and credit derivatives
  • Currency: All values reported in USD millions; converted to USD trillions (÷ 1,000,000) for this page
  • Temporal coverage: 1998 H1 through 2025 H1; reporting country coverage: all BIS reporting countries (5J code)
  • Central clearing: The BIS reports that approximately 75–80% of interest rate derivatives notional is now cleared through central counterparties, up from near-zero before 2009

The post-2008 trajectory of the market illustrates the effect of regulatory reform on structure, if not on scale. The 2009 Pittsburgh G20 commitment to mandatory central clearing — implemented through Dodd-Frank Title VII in the US and EMIR in the EU — did not reduce the volume of derivatives activity. Notional outstanding was $598 trillion at the 2008 year-end trough and has grown by 41% in the 17 years since. What changed fundamentally was counterparty risk architecture: CCP clearing for standardised swaps means that dealer default no longer propagates bilaterally across the market, as it did when Lehman Brothers’ derivatives book required a multi-month unwinding process across hundreds of counterparties. The residual risk concentration in a small number of systemically important CCPs — LCH SwapClear alone clears the majority of global interest rate swap notional — has made CCP stress testing and default waterfall adequacy the central financial stability concern in derivatives markets.

For fixed income portfolio managers and rates desks, the H1 2025 expansion in notional outstanding is a direct indicator of the volume of curve repositioning that occurred as major central banks pivoted from hiking to cutting cycles. Large moves in swap notional typically precede or accompany significant duration shifts in institutional bond portfolios — the $87 trillion year-on-year increase in IR derivatives between H1 2024 and H1 2025 is consistent with the scale of rate risk transfer that characterised 2024’s easing cycle across the Fed, ECB, and Bank of England.

Frequently Asked Questions

Notional outstanding is the face value or reference amount on which derivative payments are calculated — it represents the scale of contractual obligations, not the capital at risk. For an interest rate swap with $100 million notional, the actual cash flows exchanged are only the difference between fixed and floating rates on that $100 million, typically a few percentage points per year. The gross market value — $21.8 trillion as of H1 2025 against $845.7 trillion notional — is the better measure of true replacement cost if all contracts were closed simultaneously. Notional figures are widely cited because they track market activity and systemic interconnectedness, but analysts who equate them with loss exposure misstate risk by orders of magnitude.
Gross market value (GMV) is the cost of replacing all outstanding contracts at current market prices — the sum of positive market values across all contracts. As of H1 2025, GMV was $21.8 trillion, or 2.6% of the $845.7 trillion notional outstanding. GMV spiked to approximately $35 trillion during the 2008 financial crisis when interest rate and credit market dislocations widened mark-to-market exposures sharply. After netting (offsetting positions between the same counterparties), gross credit exposure falls further still to approximately $3–5 trillion. GMV is the most relevant metric for stress-testing counterparty exposure and for central clearing margin calculations.
Interest rate derivatives — primarily interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements, and cross-currency swaps — dominate the OTC market because they serve the largest hedging need in global finance: managing fixed-versus-floating rate exposure across bond portfolios, loan books, and funding structures. Every bank funding long-term assets with short-term liabilities, every corporation issuing fixed-rate bonds in a variable-rate world, and every sovereign managing public debt duration is a natural participant. The $665.8 trillion IR derivatives notional as of H1 2025 reflects the accumulated stock of multi-year swap contracts: a 10-year interest rate swap for $100 million contributes $100 million to notional outstanding for the full decade of its life.
The 2008 financial crisis exposed catastrophic weaknesses in bilateral OTC derivatives clearing. AIG's near-default on $440 billion in credit default swap protection triggered the largest government bailout in US history, primarily because contracts were entirely bilateral with no central margin buffer. The G20 Pittsburgh agreement in 2009 mandated central clearing for standardised OTC derivatives through central counterparties (CCPs), implemented via Dodd-Frank in the US and EMIR in the EU. By H1 2025, more than 75% of interest rate derivatives notional is centrally cleared, and CCPs now stand as the dominant counterparty in the market. The shift has concentrated systemic risk in a handful of CCPs — LCH, CME, Eurex — rather than eliminating it, making the resilience of CCP margin and default fund frameworks the primary systemic risk question in derivatives markets today.
Banks use interest rate swaps to manage the duration mismatch between fixed-rate loan assets and floating-rate deposit liabilities, and FX forwards to hedge cross-currency funding. Corporations use cross-currency swaps to convert foreign currency bond issuance into domestic currency obligations. For hedge funds, OTC derivatives offer bespoke exposure to interest rate curves, credit spreads, FX forwards, and volatility surfaces that cannot be replicated with standardised exchange-traded futures. A global macro fund might hold a receiver swaption on 10-year USD rates as a recession hedge, or enter a credit default swap index (CDX) position to express a view on high-yield credit spreads. The bilateral, customisable nature of OTC contracts is their primary advantage over listed derivatives — and the source of the counterparty risk that central clearing reforms have partially, but not fully, addressed.