US Firms Using AI in Production (Census BTOS, Sept 2025)
~10%
Share of all US businesses (narrow definition)
+6pp since late 2023
EU Enterprises Using AI Technologies (Eurostat, 2025)
20%
Share of EU enterprises with 10+ employees
+12pp since 2023
Organizations Using Gen AI in At Least One Function (McKinsey, 2025)
79%
Share of surveyed organizations (large-firm skew)
+46pp since 2023
EU Large Enterprises Using AI (250+ employees, Eurostat 2025)
55%
Share of large EU enterprises
vs. 17% for small firms (10–49 employees)

Data

SegmentUS BTOS (%)EU Eurostat (%)SourceYear
Information (software & tech)22US Census BTOS2,025
Professional / Scientific / Technical14US Census BTOS2,025
Finance & Insurance12US Census BTOS2,025
Manufacturing7US Census BTOS2,025
Retail5US Census BTOS2,025
Healthcare4US Census BTOS2,025
Large enterprises (250+ employees)55Eurostat isoc_eb_ai2,025
Medium enterprises (50–249)30.4Eurostat isoc_eb_ai2,025
Small enterprises (10–49)17Eurostat isoc_eb_ai2,025

About this Dataset

The most important fact about enterprise AI adoption statistics is that three widely-cited figures — roughly 10% of US businesses, 20% of EU enterprises, and 79% of organizations globally — are not measuring the same thing. Presenting them as a single trend would be analytically misleading. Each figure comes from a different survey instrument, a different question framing, and a different sampling frame, and understanding why they diverge tells a decision-maker more about the state of AI deployment than any one headline figure on its own.

The US Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS) provides the most statistically rigorous baseline. As a probability-sample survey drawn from the full Census Bureau Business Register, it is representative of the entire US business population by industry, size, and geography. Its question asks whether a business is "currently using AI in production" — a narrow operational test that requires a deployed system, not merely experimentation or vendor access. Under that definition, approximately 4% of US businesses reported production AI use in late 2023, rising to roughly 6.5% through 2024 and reaching approximately 10% by September 2025. That trajectory — a doubling of the adoption rate in under two years — is the strongest available evidence of genuine deployment momentum at the firm level, precisely because the denominator includes small retailers, rural manufacturers, and healthcare providers that constitute the bulk of the US business count.

In November 2025, the Census Bureau revised the BTOS question to a broader definition, and the reported US adoption rate immediately jumped to 17.3%. That figure is not comparable to earlier readings. Analysts extending this series forward should treat November 2025 as a methodological break, not a month of exceptional real-world adoption.

The EU Eurostat figure — rising from 8.0% in 2023 to 13.5% in 2024 and 20.0% in 2025 — comes from the annual Survey on ICT Usage and E-Commerce in Enterprises, which covers all EU-27 member states and firms with 10 or more employees. The Eurostat definition of "AI technologies" is broader than BTOS: it encompasses machine learning, natural language processing, speech recognition, computer vision, and robotic process automation, which likely explains why the EU series consistently registers higher than the BTOS equivalent despite the EU typically lagging the US in technology adoption. The 2025 figure of 20% represents a 12-percentage-point increase in two years, which is a meaningful shift given the structural inertia of an enterprise-count-weighted survey across 27 member states.

The McKinsey State of AI survey operates in a different register entirely. Its 2023 reading of 33%, 2024 reading of 71%, and 2025 reading of 79% reflect responses from executives and managers at organizations — primarily large companies with revenues above $1 billion — who chose to participate in McKinsey's annual survey. The question asks whether the organization uses generative AI "in at least one business function," a definition broad enough to encompass a single department's ChatGPT subscription. Participation skews toward technology-forward organizations that actively monitor AI developments, which systematically inflates the reported adoption rate relative to the full business population. The McKinsey series is best understood as a leading indicator for large enterprise behaviour among organizations already engaged with AI — not as a representative cross-section of global business activity.

Sectoral concentration within the US data sharpens the picture further. The Information sector — software firms, technology providers, data services — reports approximately 22% production AI use under BTOS, nearly five times the rate for Healthcare (4%) or Retail (5%). Professional and Scientific Services (14%) and Finance and Insurance (12%) follow at roughly double the all-business average. This stratification suggests that aggregate adoption figures understate the degree to which AI is already structurally embedded in the technology and professional services economy, while overstating the relevance of those figures to the broader economy of small manufacturers, healthcare providers, and consumer-facing retailers.

In the EU, the more economically significant stratification runs by firm size rather than sector. Eurostat's 2025 data shows large enterprises (250+ employees) at 55% adoption — more than three times the rate for small enterprises with 10 to 49 employees (17%). Medium enterprises (50–249 employees) sit at 30.4%. The practical implication for corporate strategy and M&A analysis is that EU firms with under 50 employees are mostly at early-adoption or pre-adoption stages, while large-cap European corporates have already cleared the initial deployment threshold and are differentiating on depth of integration rather than presence or absence of AI.

Key series characteristics for professional use:

  • BTOS (US): Biweekly probability sample, employment-weighted; narrow "currently using AI in production" definition; annual scope through 2023–2025 used here; definitional break in November 2025 creates a series discontinuity.
  • Eurostat isoc_eb_ai: Annual enterprise-count-weighted survey, EU-27, enterprises with 10+ employees; broad "AI technologies" definition; most recent data 2025.
  • McKinsey State of AI: Annual self-selected executive survey; organization-level question on generative AI in at least one function; respondent pool skews large and technology-forward; figures likely overstate representative global business adoption by a significant margin.

For investment analysis, the BTOS series is the most defensible for modelling US production AI penetration, particularly for mid-market and SMB-oriented business models where large-firm surveys are uninformative. The Eurostat series provides the most comparable cross-country framework for EU exposure assessments, with the firm-size breakdown offering the clearest segmentation for target company analysis. The McKinsey series, despite its sampling limitations, tracks directional momentum within the large-enterprise cohort most likely to drive near-term enterprise software revenues and AI platform market share.

Frequently Asked Questions

The two numbers measure fundamentally different things and should not be compared directly. The US Census Bureau BTOS asks businesses whether they are 'currently using AI in production' — a narrow operational test focused on deployed systems. It surveys all US businesses by size and industry. McKinsey's State of AI survey asks executives whether their organization uses generative AI in 'at least one business function' — a broader definition that includes piloting, non-core functions, and single-user deployments. Critically, McKinsey's respondent pool overrepresents large technology-forward enterprises: its 2025 sample consisted primarily of managers and C-suite executives at companies with revenues above $1 billion, and participation is self-selected, systematically attracting organizations that follow AI developments closely. The 69-percentage-point gap between the two figures reflects both the definitional breadth and the sampling bias of each survey instrument, not a contradiction in the data.
The Business Trends and Outlook Survey is a biweekly probability-sample survey operated by the US Census Bureau and Federal Reserve. Unlike most AI adoption surveys, BTOS uses a random probability sample from the Census Bureau's Business Register, which means its results are statistically representative of the full US business population by industry, firm size, and geography. Its narrow definition — 'currently using AI in production' — is also more economically meaningful than broader 'experimenting with' framings, because it captures deployments that have cleared an organization's implementation hurdle. The tradeoff is that the BTOS question covers any AI broadly (not just generative AI), and the narrow definition means the absolute share remains low even as uptake accelerates. Starting in November 2025 the Census Bureau revised the wording to a broader definition, which immediately pushed the reported figure to 17.3%; readings before and after that date are not directly comparable.
In November 2025, the Census Bureau broadened the BTOS question wording from a narrow 'currently using AI in production' framing to a broader definition that encompasses a wider range of AI-related activities. This caused the reported US adoption rate to jump from approximately 10% (the September 2025 reading under the old question) to 17.3% under the revised question. This is a survey methodology artefact, not evidence of a sudden doubling in real-world deployment. The series on this page uses only pre-November 2025 BTOS readings under the narrow definition to maintain a consistent time series from late 2023 through September 2025. Analysts building models that extend this US series forward will need to account for the break and use the November 2025 broader-definition figures as a new baseline.
BTOS sectoral data for 2025 shows sharp stratification. The Information sector — which includes software firms and technology companies — leads at roughly 22%, nearly triple the all-business average. Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services follows at approximately 14%, reflecting heavy AI use in consulting, legal, and analytical services. Finance and Insurance firms report around 12%, consistent with early adoption of AI in credit, fraud detection, and client-facing automation. Manufacturing, Retail, and Healthcare trail at 7%, 5%, and 4% respectively. The sectoral gap illustrates that aggregate adoption figures mask a bifurcated market: technology-intensive sectors already have substantial AI integration, while the larger share of the business economy — small manufacturers, healthcare providers, and retailers — remains in early stages. This concentration also helps explain why the BTOS employment-weighted figures show higher rates in sectors with larger average firm sizes.
Eurostat's 2025 isoc_eb_ai data reveals a pronounced firm-size gradient that the EU aggregate figure of 20% does not fully convey. Large enterprises with 250 or more employees report a 55% adoption rate — more than triple the small enterprise rate. Medium enterprises (50–249 employees) sit at 30.4%, and small enterprises with 10 to 49 employees report 17.0%. The pattern reflects cost and capability barriers: large enterprises typically have dedicated data and IT teams, established vendor relationships, and the revenue base to justify AI investment. For deal teams assessing target companies, the implication is that firms with fewer than 50 employees in the EU are likely at the early stages of AI integration, while large enterprises in technology-intensive sectors may already be consolidating around a small number of AI platforms.
The isoc_eb_ai series is drawn from Eurostat's annual Survey on ICT Usage and E-Commerce in Enterprises, conducted across all EU member states. It covers enterprises with 10 or more employees and asks whether the firm used any AI technologies in the reference year. 'AI technologies' in the Eurostat definition includes machine learning, natural language processing, speech recognition, computer vision, and robotic process automation — a broad but consistent definition applied annually across all member states. The 2023 figure of 8.0% and the 2025 figure of 20.0% are enterprise-count weighted, meaning each qualifying enterprise counts equally regardless of employment size; this differs from the BTOS which uses an employment-weighted framework. The Eurostat series is harmonised across EU-27 member states, making it the most directly comparable cross-country dataset for European AI adoption, though national implementations may vary slightly in how the survey is administered.