Average of the panel (2023)
8.6
percent of GDP
unchanged vs 2022
Highest
11.7
Germany
Lowest
5.5
Liechtenstein
Countries ranked
32
with a published figure

Data

Health Spending in Europe by Country (2023) — source data. Eurostat.
# Country % of GDP Change vs 2022
1 Germany 11.7 -0.7pp
2 France 11.5 -0.4pp
3 Switzerland 11.3 +0.1pp
4 Sweden 11.2 +0.3pp
5 Austria 11.2 unchanged
6 Belgium 10.8 unchanged
7 Finland 10.5 +0.7pp
8 Netherlands 10 unchanged
9 Portugal 10 -0.6pp
10 Denmark 9.6 unchanged
11 Montenegro 9.5 -0.7pp
12 Slovenia 9.3 -0.3pp
13 Spain 9.2 -0.4pp
14 Malta 8.7 -0.6pp
15 Iceland 8.6 -0.3pp
16 Greece 8.4 -0.1pp
17 Czechia 8.4 -0.1pp
18 Italy 8.4 -0.5pp
19 Serbia 8 -0.6pp
20 Bulgaria 7.9 +0.3pp
21 Cyprus 7.8 -0.3pp
22 Estonia 7.4 +0.5pp
23 Slovakia 7.4 -0.3pp
24 Lithuania 7.3 unchanged
25 Latvia 7.2 -0.9pp
26 Poland 7.1 +0.5pp
27 Croatia 7 -0.3pp
28 Hungary 6.4 -0.3pp
29 Ireland 6.3 +0.4pp
30 Romania 5.8 -0.1pp
31 Luxembourg 5.6 unchanged
32 Liechtenstein 5.5 -0.1pp

About this Dataset

Current health expenditure ranges from 11.7% of GDP in Germany to 5.5% in Liechtenstein, against a panel average of 8.6%. That average held at 8.6% for a second year, having already given back most of its 2020–21 rise.

Share of GDP and spending per person answer different questions. The first measures the claim health makes on the economy; the second measures what is actually available per patient. Romania scores far better on the first than on the second.

Germany, France, Switzerland, Sweden and Austria lead the table, all above 11% of GDP. What they have in common is an old population and comprehensive coverage rather than a single financing model. Germany and France run social insurance, Sweden a tax-funded service, Switzerland compulsory private insurance. At the bottom, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Romania and Ireland spend under 7% of GDP, though for different reasons: Luxembourg and Ireland have GDP denominators that flatter them, while in Romania and the other eastern European members the low figure is real and a high share of it is paid directly by patients. Out-of-pocket financing is the arrangement most associated with people going without care.

Every row is the figure published for 2023; no value is carried over from an adjacent year to fill a gap. Norway has not published a 2023 figure and is left out rather than carried forward from an older year. The chart tracks a fixed panel of 28 countries: those reporting in every year from 2013. The line therefore moves because the countries moved, not because the sample changed. Figures follow the System of Health Accounts (SHA 2011) and cover current expenditure only, excluding capital investment.

Country pages: Germany · France · Switzerland · Sweden · Austria · Belgium · Finland · Netherlands · Portugal · Denmark · Montenegro · Slovenia · Spain · Malta · Iceland · Greece · Czechia · Italy · Serbia · Bulgaria · Cyprus · Estonia · Slovakia · Lithuania · Latvia · Poland · Croatia · Hungary · Ireland · Romania · Luxembourg · Liechtenstein

Frequently Asked Questions

As a share of GDP, Germany at 11.7% in 2023, followed by France, Switzerland and Sweden. The ordering changes if you measure spending per person instead: Switzerland, Luxembourg and the Nordic countries spend more per head than Germany does, because a smaller share of a larger income can still be a larger amount.

Across this group the relationship is weak. Spain and Italy achieve some of Europe's highest life expectancies on health budgets around 9.2% and 8.4% of GDP, below the panel average of 8.6%. Above roughly 8% of GDP, how money is allocated — primary care capacity, prevention, and the share of costs falling directly on patients — predicts outcomes better than the total does.

All final consumption of healthcare goods and services in the year, whoever pays: government schemes, compulsory and voluntary insurance, and out-of-pocket payments by households. It covers curative and rehabilitative care, long-term care, medical goods including pharmaceuticals, prevention and administration. It excludes capital investment in hospitals and equipment, which is reported separately, so it understates total resources going into health systems in years of heavy construction.